2025 Public Training Schedule
January 14 – 17, 2025 – Agile Analysis and Design Patterns – Half-Day Sessions
Follow me on Twitter:
Blog Post Categories
- Announcements {19}
- Articles {2}
- Bits and Pieces {74}
- Blogosphere {1}
- Bonuses {2}
- Build in Small Batches {27}
- Collaborate {38}
- Create CLEAN Code {34}
- Implement the Design Last {11}
- Integrate Continuously {30}
- Off-Topic but Interesting {3}
- Rants {82}
- Refactor Legacy Code {24}
- Say What, Why, and for Whom Before How {22}
- Seven Strategies {38}
- Specify Behaviors with Tests {17}
- Write the Test First {27}
Archives
Privacy Policy
(c) 2024 To Be Agile
- May 20, 2020
- Refactor Legacy Code
Of course, the best time to refactor code is while it’s fresh in your mind, right after having worked with it. Once I get a feature to work, I go back and think about how I can make the code easier to understand. I’ve done this so often that it’s natural for me, almost of reflex.
Cleaning up code at this phase generally involves changing names of methods and attributes to more clearly state their purpose. Naming is my first line of defense in communicating what my code does. I want my names to be clear but when I’m in the process of discovering an implementation, I may not be as tuned in to refining what the name should actually be. Once I have an implementation that works then I’ll go back and see if I need to clarify any of my names.
Another cleanup activity that I’ll do at this point is to extract small methods from larger methods. I extract methods because it gives me the opportunity to name little bits of functionality instead of describing what I’m doing in a code comment. I find that if I can name some functionality, that it’s useful to wrap that functionality in a method with that name. I do this instead of using block comments in code because it makes my code more expressive. I want readers to read my code and not focus on reading comments.
Once I get a feature working as I want, instead of writing up what I did in a comment or external document, I go back to the code and see if I can let it tell the story, again by using good intention revealing names for the methods and attributes letting them say what the code is doing.
I want the code itself to say what it is doing but oftentimes code cannot say why it is doing what it is doing. To express why our code is doing what it is doing we often use block comments. This is the good use of comments whereas when we use comments to say what the code is doing we are just repeating ourselves from what the code says. Instead, I rather make the code clear and then I won’t feel like I have to have a comment saying what the code is doing. This will eliminate most of the comments in code and reserve them for only expressing the unexpected or for providing context around a large block of code.
The other thing that I will take a close look at when I have an implementation working but before I move on is to make sure that I don’t have any unnecessary dependencies. I want the dependencies in my code to represent real needs and I want to inject them into my code so that when I’m running tests I can inject test doubles or mocks instead. I want to try to avoid using singletons or service locators or other global states so that my software is as independently verifiable as possible.
Ideally, before moving on I want to make sure that I not only have clean code but also that I have good tests that express the intention of the code that I just built. Once I have these things I feel comfortable moving on.
Note: This blog post is based on one of the “Seven Strategies…” sections in my book, Beyond Legacy Code: Nine Practices to Extend the Life (and Value) of Your Software.
Previous Post: « Refactor to Redesign When You Know More
Next Post: Refactor to Learn What Not to Do »